Aircraft for Engineering Organization- MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about theAircraft for Engineering Organization. Answer: Introduction Working as a junior Manager in one of the Companies dealing in Aircraft maintenance, it is important to ensure that I set up an effective new line of work to ensure that the company which deals with the maintenance of small passenger aircraft is successful. To be able to do that, I will be required to set up teams through making numerous considerations as stipulated in the report below which will be presented to my Senior Manager in the company. Among other issues, the report detailed below is aimed at looking at how different working Relationships work within our company and the relevance or appropriateness of objectives of relationships in or within Engineering (Kerzner, 2013). Apart from that, the report to the Senior Manager of the Company will also be aimed at working out how the lines of authority need to be put in place in the organization and look at the various roles and responsibilities of Employees in the company as well as how its sub-contractors can be managed. Explanation of the Different Working Relationships within an Engineering Organization Creation of a productive and positive working relationship in an Engineering organization is very essential since it makes it easier for such an organization to achieve its set objectives and goals. It is always prudent to ensure that there is maximum respect between the senior and junior staff within an engineering organization (Kapur Pecht, 2014). One of the important working relationships that should be created in an Engineering organization is that there must be creation of a productive as well as positive working relationships across culture in the organization. The achievement of a positive cultural working relationship across the organization can b made possible when it is build with not only the sensitivity but also understanding over a given time frame. It is important to note that even though engineering counterparts emanating from various countries may be well versed with the same scientific principles and disciplines, they usually operate in different cultural settings. Two engineering teams that come from different cultures can be able to work within a specific set of expectations, norms, and rules. People may thus assume that other engineers may act under the similar set of rules as theirs (Buede Miller, 2016). However, when that does not happen, this implies that there is failure to meet expectations thus resulting in conflicts as well as disasters. It is prudent to note that even though Engineers may be working together in countries which have a shared cultural heritage which ultimately results in shared beliefs and values, there can still exist differences especially related to approaches to rules and time. Another type of working relationship that should be enhanced in the Aircraft Company is good communication skills. It is important for all and sundry in the aircraft company to note that each person is different and thus the best communication style should be used appropriately when dealing with different people in the organization. Examination of Lines of Authority in an Engineering Organization Lines of authority refer to the most fundamental authority in the company that depicts existing superior-subordinate relationships. It comprises of the right of making decisions and also give orders regarding production, finance, or sales finance associated behaviour of the subordinates. It can also be asserted that a line of authority in a business entity or aircraft company will establish individuals who are in charge of giving others orders and significantly contributes to the effective achievement of organizational goals, especially when used properly (Harper, 2015). The line authority that will be used in the Aircraft Company will comprise of managers who will be directly responsible for the achievement of organizational goals. As a result, line introduction at the aircraft Maintenance Company will actually be represented through a standard command chain that will start with the companys Board of Directors and eventually extend down to the activities which are implemented by the company (Licht, 2014). Line authority at the Aircraft Maintenance Company will be mainly be based on the legitimate power. Lines of authority at the Aircraft maintenance company will be identified and be based on the goals of the company. As a result, managers line functions will be limited to production lines of authority, maintenance lines of authority, and sales lines of authority. The production line of authority will mainly deal with the numerous spare parts that will have to be availed in the maintenance of the aircraft while the maintenance line of authority will deal with the actual maintenance of the aircrafts (Child, 2015). The sales line of authority will be concerned with receiving the cash for the various products fitted in the aircrafts and the service when maintaining them. In essence, it will be prudent to ensure that there is clear definition of lines of authority for all the employees in the Aircraft maintenance company by making all employees in the organization become aware of their roles and responsibilities (Stuart, 2015). Roles and Responsibilities of Employees within an Engineering Context The Aircraft Maintenance manager The Aircraft Maintenance manager will be tasked with the responsibility of providing daily oversight of all the operational and functional activities in the maintenance of aircraft machinery, equipment, and facilities (Cech, 2014). Among other duties, the manager will also be responsible for the successful implemental of all the relevant management processes in the company and ensure that he or she recommends the relevant equipment modifications for the upgrades. The manager will also be tasked with the responsibility of developing and maintaining the relevant preventative maintenance programs. Aircraft Maintenance Mechanics Aircraft maintenance mechanics at the company will be tasked with the responsibility of accurately repairing and performing schedules maintenance on all the airplanes and ensure that inspections are performed as mandated or required by the relevant bodies and authorities. Apart from that, the mechanics at the aircraft maintenance company will also be responsible for performing full analysis of all the required work orders, sketches, and drawings to not only troubleshoot but also repair and install the required parts or products (Tafel-Viia Alas, 2015). The mechanics, based on an engineering context will also be required to ensure that they check all the mechanical components of the aircrafts before installation so as to prevent any damage. That apart, mechanics at this aircraft maintenance company will be tasked with the responsibility of ensuring that they accurately estimate the materials and the hours for the jobs that have been scheduled. Aircraft Maintenance Team Lead These individuals will be reporting to the maintenance supervisor and they will be tasked with the responsibility of meeting both the scheduled as well as the unscheduled requirements of maintenance, directing and leading the work of aircraft technicians (Breaugh, 2017). They will also be responsible for the coordination of daily aircraft maintenance activities in collaboration with maintenance supervisors. They will also lead and direct the work or activities of aircraft technicians for inspection, maintenance, troubleshooting, and repair of aircraft structures, systems, and engines. Review of the Relevance of Objectives of Working Relationships within an Engineering Context Having relevant working objectives is very essential for the Aircraft maintenance company in an engineering context due to various reasons. For example, having objectives of working relationships in the engineering context will help the company to take appropriate steps to achieve optimal performance management by avoiding any potential internal obstacles that may occur in the company (Wong et al, 2014). They will also help the company to implement innovative solutions which are geared towards ensuring that organizational processes deliver not only real results but also enhance performance. Working relationships are essential in an engineering context because they will greatly help such organizations to come up with practical steps and concrete guidelines which can be used in enhancing the performance management processes at the aircraft maintenance company. Objectives of working relationships in an engineering context are very essential because they help in ensuring that the actions of each and every employee in the organization is well aligned to the strategic objectives of the company. Having effective working relationship objectives is also prudent in the engineering context because they will help in provision of visibility and clarification of accountability which is related or associated towards expectations of performance (Pahl Beitz, 2013). In addition to that, working relationships in an engineering context are quite essential in that they will help in the documentation of individual performance that will be aimed at supporting career planning as well as compensation decisions. Moreover, objectives of working relationships will help in the establishment of focus for the development of essential skills as well as learning choices activities (Braglia Frosolini, 2014). As a result, this will be beneficial in the creation of the r elevant documentation that may be used for legal reasons to not only support decisions but also minimize disputes in the engineering context. They will also help in the reduction of poorly structured processes in the company. An Explanation of how Sub-Contractors can be Managed A sub-contractor refers to a person or an organization which takes part of a contract from the main or principal contractor or even from another different subcontractor. A subcontractor can also be defined as being a person or a business which carries out work or tasks for an organization as being part of a larger or bigger project. Sub-contractors play a significant role in the general success of the aircraft maintenance company (Kuzniarz et al, 2015). It is therefore important that the company does not choose contractors just based on price alone but rather on their ability to deliver the assigned duties on time as well as on required safety and quality standard. This is quite important since choosing of subcontractors for the aircraft maintenance company based on the cheapness of the price that they offer may cost the company more money as opposed to when an expensive subcontractor was chosen. To effectively manage subcontractors, the aircraft maintenance company should actually view them as being an extension of the general or main contractor and therefore failure by such subcontractors will adversely affect the reputation of the company (Pinder, 2014). When managing the aircraft maintenance companys subcontractors, it is important for the company to comprehend the scope of work for the subcontractor and understand the people who will be supplying all the relevant materials. It is also important for the aircraft maintenance company to effectively understand how the subcontractor they have engaged will be properly reimbursed. The company ought to ensure that the subcontractors that it has hired receives both access and information ahead or on schedule and it should never be delayed by the company or even by other subcontractors that it has hired (Hwang Ng, 2016). Regular meetings should also be held by the relevant subcontractor in order to discuss environmental, quality, and safety issues. Bibliography Braglia, M. and Frosolini, M., 2014. An integrated approach to implement project management information systems within the extended enterprise. International Journal of Project Management, 32(1), pp.18-29. Breaugh, J.A., 2017. to Recruitment. The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of the Psychology of Recruitment, Selection and Employee Retention, p.12. Buede, D. M., Miller, W. D. (2016). The engineering design of systems: models and methods. John Wiley Sons. Cech, E.A., 2014. Culture of disengagement in engineering education?. Science, Technology, Human Values, 39(1), pp.42-72. Child, J., 2015. Organization: contemporary principles and practice. John Wiley Sons. Harper, C., 2015. Organizations: Structures, processes and outcomes. Routledge. Hwang, B.G. and Ng, H.B., 2016. Project network management: risks and contributors from the viewpoint of contractors and sub-contractors. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 22(4), pp.631-648. Kapur, K.C. and Pecht, M., 2014. Reliability engineering. John Wiley Sons. Kerzner, H., 2013. Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. John Wiley Sons. Licht, W., 2014. Working for the Railroad: the Organization of Work in the Nineteenth Century. Princeton University Press. Pahl, G. and Beitz, W., 2013. Engineering design: a systematic approach. Springer Science Business Media. Petersen, K., Vakkalanka, S. and Kuzniarz, L., 2015. Guidelines for conducting systematic mapping studies in software engineering: An update. Information and Software Technology, 64, pp.1-18. Pinder, C.C., 2014. Work motivation in organizational behavior. Psychology Press. Stuart, D., 2015. Risk assessment. Company Director, 31(5), p.50. Tafel-Viia, K. and Alas, R., 2015. Differences and Conflicts between Owners and top Managers in the Context of Social Responsibility. Engineering Economics, 64(4). Zou, W., Kumaraswamy, M., Chung, J. and Wong, J., 2014. Identifying the critical success factors for relationship management in PPP projects. International Journal of Project Management, 32(2), pp.265-274.